JSOM Header

This week's featured articles

7/1/2023

A Review of Medical Evacuations Related to Dental Emergencies and Oral-Maxillofacial Injuries

Top

Qureshi I, Simecek J, Mitchener TA. 23(2). 82 - 87. (Journal Article)

Abstract

A literature review was performed to determine the frequency of medical evacuations (MEDEVAC) that are required for dental emergencies (DE) and oral-maxillofacial (OMF) injuries. Fourteen studies were reviewed altogether - eight which quantified evacuation of DEs or OMF injuries in military personnel (from 1982-2013) and six studies that discussed medical evacuation of DEs occurring in civilians working in offshore oil and gas rigs and wilderness expeditions (from 1976-2015). Among military personnel, DE/OMF issues were frequently among one of the top categories of medical evacuations, ranging from 2-16% of all evacuations. Among oil and gas industry workers, 5.3-14.6% of evacuations were dental-related, while one study of wilderness expeditions found that DEs ranked as the third most frequent type of injury that required evacuation. Previous studies have shown that dental and OMF problems often account for one of most frequently cited reasons for evacuation. However, due to the limited study base of DE/OMF medical evacuations, further research is needed to determine their impact on the cost of health care delivery

Keywords: medical evacuation; MEDEVAC; military personnel; dental emergencies; oil and gas industry; emergencies; dental care; health care costs; stomatognathic diseases

PMID: 37071889

DOI: JSEQ-S0JT

Buy Now

Conventional Resilience and the Impact of Catastrophic Injury Exposure on Special Operations Surgical Teams

Top

Jeschke EA, Baker JB, Wyma-Bradley J, Dorsch J, Huffman SL. 23(2). 102 - 106. (Journal Article)

Abstract

This article presents a justification for using an ethnographic approach to research resilience. Our hypothesis is that the conventional resilience construct is ineffective in achieving its stated goal of mitigating diagnosable stress pathologies because it is grounded in a set of assumptions that overlook human experience when examining human performance in combat. To achieve this goal, we (1) describe the evolution of the strategic framework within which the conventional resilience construct is defined; (2) highlight certain limiting assumptions entailed in this framework; (3) explain how bottom-up ethnographic research relates the medic's practical performance to military requirements and mission capabilities; and (4) articulate the unique elements of our study that widen the aperture of the conventional resilience construct. We conclude by gesturing to initial research findings.

Keywords: resilience; SOST; Special Operations Surgical Team; SOF special operations; catastrophic; injury; ethnographic; combat

PMID: 37169528

DOI: FHIP-DWHB

Buy Now